AntiGPT vs WriteHuman
WriteHuman prices by number of requests per month, each with a word cap, up to an unlimited tier. AntiGPT prices by words. Request-based pricing rewards long, infrequent rewrites; word-based pricing rewards many short ones and makes the cost of each action explicit. Both include detection checks; neither guarantees a result.
| Feature | AntiGPT | WriteHuman |
|---|---|---|
| Metering | Words per month (cost shown per request) | Requests per month, each word-cappedsource |
| Entry paid plan | Starter $11.99/mo · 10,000 words, 1,500/request | Basic ~$18/mo ($12 annual) · ~80 requests × 200 wordssource |
| Top plan | Max $49.99/mo · 120,000 words, 6,000/request | Ultra ~$48/mo · unlimited requests, 3,000 words/requestsource |
| Free tier | 300 words/month, recurring | ~3–5 requests/month, ~200–250 words eachsource |
| In-app detector | Yes: before/after, disclaimed estimate | Yes: detection checks includedsource |
| Failed requests | Never charged | Not stated |
| Ghana / mobile money | Yes (Paystack, GHS) | USD card |
Facts about WriteHuman are taken from its published pages; last verified 2026-09-20. We make no claims about any competitor's detection or pass rates.
Which should you use?
WriteHuman's request-based tiers are simple if your work is a few long rewrites a month. AntiGPT's word metering is fairer if you make lots of small edits, shows the cost before each action, and never charges for a failure. For Ghanaian writers, AntiGPT is payable with mobile money; WriteHuman is card-only.